Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Christopher Cook's avatar

The subject of the Enclosures is interesting to me. I do not yet know nearly enough about the history.

Property (the ability to say "this thing is exclusively mine") is essential for human life. The alternative—contra the communists—is not paradise, but hell. This must also include land. Otherwise, people could come sleep in your house and just say, "Hey, all property is common, remember?"

But the common land that got enclosed in the Enclosures seems to me to have been the property of the people using it. That had never been formalized because it never needed to be.

How would you say it should have been handled? I wish I knew more about the Enclosures. One argument might be to say that they violated the Lockean Proviso…

Expand full comment
David W Runyan II's avatar

Lady Sue, that is a concept I've never heard of! Here in the US there is no such right to roam, there is only laws to punish trespassers. I think they get around it by having some kind of forest preserve in each town.

Expand full comment
141 more comments...

No posts